In a decision that has raised significant concerns among Second Amendment advocates, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Biden administration regulation requiring serial numbers and background checks for so-called “ghost guns”—firearms assembled from kits without serial numbers. The 7-2 ruling affirms that these kits fall under existing federal firearm laws, mandating the same regulatory requirements as traditional firearms.
Background
Ghost guns have become increasingly popular among firearm enthusiasts who value privacy and the ability to build their own firearms. These kits allow individuals to assemble fully functional firearms without serial numbers, thus bypassing traditional tracking and registration systems. Proponents argue that this practice is a legitimate exercise of Second Amendment rights and a means to maintain personal privacy.
Court’s Decision
The Supreme Court’s majority opinion, authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, asserts that firearm kits designed for easy assembly into operable firearms are subject to the same regulations as fully assembled guns. This interpretation expands the scope of federal oversight, requiring serial numbers and background checks for these kits.
Dissenting Opinions
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, arguing that the Gun Control Act of 1968 does not explicitly cover unfinished frames or receivers included in these kits. They contend that the majority’s interpretation oversteps the original statutory language and infringes upon constitutional rights.
Implications for Gun Owners
This ruling sets a concerning precedent for firearm enthusiasts and advocates of gun rights. By subjecting gun kits to the same regulations as complete firearms, the decision imposes additional barriers for individuals who prefer to build their own guns. Critics argue that this undermines personal freedoms and does little to address the root causes of criminal activity, as those intent on breaking the law are unlikely to be deterred by regulatory measures.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the regulation of ghost guns represents a significant shift in firearm policy, with potential ramifications for Second Amendment rights. As legal challenges continue and the debate over gun control persists, it is imperative for advocates to remain vigilant and engaged in protecting constitutional freedoms.
For more information on this ruling, visit AP News.
